This article was updated on April 18, 2024.
Written by Michael Feder
Reviewed by Kathryn Uhles, MIS, MSP, Dean, College of Business and IT
Whether you’re interested in becoming an entrepreneur or simply pursuing a business degree, you’ll likely use one or more of several management styles during your career. Understanding management tactics can help you in many capacities, from learning how to lead and manage people more effectively as a team to fostering a more positive experience on group projects for school and work.
Becoming more familiar with management styles can also complement the knowledge gained from such business degree programs as:
Here, we explore different leadership styles that can be implemented in management positions.
Management styles describe the method and approach a manager uses to motivate, direct and oversee their team. It encompasses decision-making; planning and organization; and interaction with employees. Different management styles have unique effects on team dynamics, productivity and culture. For managers, adopting the style that best fits their team and organizational goals is crucial.
There are a wide variety of leadership styles, and the leadership characteristics that a manager chooses to employ are important. Applying the wrong one to the wrong team can lead to miscommunication at best and organizational disaster at worst. Consider how the following eight management types fit both your personality and that of the team you lead.
Affiliative management focuses on creating and maintaining positive relationships within the team. Consider it a "people first" approach. Affiliative management encourages team-building exercises and aims to make everyone feel comfortable and appreciated. The overall goal is to promote cooperation and harmony.
The advantages of an affiliative management style include:
The disadvantages of affiliative management are:
Every organization may want to consider having an affiliative leader to enhance the workplace.
Autocratic leadership is the opposite of affiliative management. This style hinges upon control and power, with decision-making resting entirely in the hands of one person: the manager.
Generally, autocratic managers take charge of day-to-day operations and provide each team member with precise instructions. These bosses might frequently check on the team's progress to ensure everything is on schedule.
The advantages of autocratic management include:
The disadvantages of autocratic management include:
While this style may not be suitable for all workplaces, it can be successful for managers who have a clear vision and a firm commitment to deadlines as well as a team that thrives under directive management.
A coaching leadership management style leader builds a strong connection with employees and helps them improve their professional skills and abilities through one-on-one guidance. Team members are encouraged to experiment with new ideas while meeting company targets.
The advantages of coaching management include:
The disadvantages of coaching management include:
The coaching management style might be ideal for employees who want to improve their professional skills and managers who can commit to helping them get there.
This type of boss is often a strong leader who makes quick decisions and expects team members to follow orders. It is a common method for influencing employee behavior.
The advantages of commanding management include:
The disadvantages of commanding management include:
The commanding management style might be best suited for employees looking for decisive leadership and clear direction.
Democratic managers encourage team members to take the initiative, question the status quo, make suggestions and collaborate. It’s a participative, or shared, leadership style.
The advantages of democratic management include:
The disadvantages of democratic management include:
The democratic management style is best suited for shared leadership that encourages creative thinking and collaboration. This type of management might be helpful when the company has a diverse workforce or no clear leader.
Laissez-faire leadership describes a hands-off style where the boss allows employees to make their own decisions and often leads by example rather than by providing direct instructions.
The advantages of laissez-faire management include:
The disadvantages of laissez-faire management include:
The laissez-faire management style is best suited to those looking for a more relaxed work environment where employees are expected to take the initiative. This type of management could be used when a company has a lot of experienced employees or is in a stable state.
Pace-setting managers are usually more direct when communicating with employees and have little tolerance for those who fail to pull their weight in the workplace.
The advantages of pace-setting management include:
The disadvantages of pace-setting management include:
Pace-setting management might be ideal for more traditional work environments at companies that are looking to increase productivity. This type of leadership style might be used when the company is expanding or has a lot of new employees.
Visionary managers encourage employees to be proactive and take the initiative, and they try to inspire a generally positive attitude in the workplace. They believe in empowering their employees and giving them enough information to make informed decisions while letting go of control when necessary.
The advantages of visionary management include:
The disadvantages of visionary management include:
Visionary management might be found at companies looking to develop a proactive and positive work culture. This type of management could be used when the company is a startup or has recently undergone changes.
Mastering your management skills is one of many essential tips for successfully starting your own business, but entrepreneurs aren’t the only people who benefit. Your employees may become leaders down the road, and they’ll take their management style cues from you. Finding the best management style for you will come with trial and error, and it may end up shifting down the line as your team composition changes.
One of the best things about the different types of management styles is flexibility. You can combine approaches to create a management style that works best for you and your team. Management styles are not one size fits all, so it’s important to find the one that works best for you and your company — and maybe customize it to your objectives.
Here, we speak with Joseph Aranyosi, associate dean of the College of Business and Information Technology at University of Phoenix, about what he feels makes an effective manager.
“In my opinion, the most effective managers are those who can adapt to changing employee, workplace and project needs,” Aranyosi says. “It's a lot like a TV series, where you start off with a great original premise, but you just need to tweak the setting or some of the characters in season 2 to get everything just right. The best managers make similar adjustments to transform their team until it's working in sync. The managers who are unable to adapt are the ‘one-hit wonders’ as opposed to the ‘multiplatinum artists.’”
If you’re looking to expand your business skill set and have been considering a business program, consider the following at UOPX:
Michael Feder is a content marketing specialist at University of Phoenix, where he researches and writes on a variety of topics, ranging from healthcare to IT. He is a graduate of the Johns Hopkins University Writing Seminars program and a New Jersey native!
Currently Dean of the College of Business and Information Technology, Kathryn Uhles has served University of Phoenix in a variety of roles since 2006. Prior to joining University of Phoenix, Kathryn taught fifth grade to underprivileged youth in Phoenix.